Delta government enforces strict grooming and dress code for public servants

The Delta State Government has sparked debate with a new directive banning bushy beards, artificial braided or dyed hair, long eyelashes, fake nails, and other appearances it has labeled as “indecent” for public servants.

The circular, released on Wednesday by the Office of the Head of Service, orders civil servants to maintain a neat, professional, and modest appearance reflective of their rank and role in the service. Male officers are specifically prohibited from growing bushy beards or wearing certain traditional caps such as the “Resource Control” or “Papas” styles, while female officers are warned against artificial braided or dyed hair, long eyelashes, and fake nails.

The new rules also extend to dress codes. Senior officers are now required to wear full corporate suits, while junior officers are instructed to appear in trousers, shirts, and ties. Female employees are expected to wear trouser suits, skirt suits, or corporate gowns below the knee with sleeves, with sleeveless outfits, spaghetti straps, and revealing clothing expressly banned. Traditional attire will only be permitted on Fridays or during special occasions, and only if it is deemed clean, decent, and modest.

Heads of departments have been directed to enforce compliance by sending home any staff found violating the rules and ensuring sanctions are applied to repeat offenders. The government insists the policy is not arbitrary but rooted in the Public Service Rule No. 04314, which prohibits officers from appearing in attire considered inappropriate or immodest.

Officials argue that the directive is aimed at restoring discipline, professionalism, and decorum within the public service. But the sweeping nature of the ban raises questions about whether the state is overreaching in dictating personal appearance, particularly with its prohibition of cultural styles and body choices that are commonplace in society.

The decision also comes at a time when civil servants in the state face pressing concerns over welfare and working conditions, prompting critics to suggest that the government may be prioritizing appearances over more substantive reforms.

While the circular is already in effect, its enforcement is likely to test both the commitment of department heads and the willingness of public servants to comply, as the balance between discipline and personal freedom in the workplace comes under fresh scrutiny.